HSE Professional Guide · Safety & Health Coordination · Issue 1
Omitting HSE Coordination from the Design Phase Is Not a Saving — It Is an Uncalculated Risk Assumption
Many in the industry know this should be done. Few actually do it. This article argues why this omission is not a neutral decision.
In the preparation phase of construction projects, the absence of a health, safety and environment (HSE) coordinator is common practice — not only in Hungary but across many European markets. This decision is rarely made consciously; it simply never makes the agenda. This article argues that this omission is not a neutral decision: any project that fails to involve an HSE coordinator during the design phase is taking on direct financial, legal and technical risk — risk that most decision-makers cannot see, because it has not been quantified.
The Assumption Underlying Industry Practice — and Why It Is Flawed
The implicit logic behind omitting design-phase HSE coordination is straightforward: health and safety issues can be addressed during construction, and their involvement at the design stage is premature and an unnecessary cost.
This reasoning is vulnerable on three counts.
First — the risk is invisible, not absent
Risk does not originate in the construction phase — it only becomes visible there. Every structural, mechanical and technological design decision carries health and safety consequences. A poorly accessible installation zone, a sub-optimal assembly sequence — these are not born on the construction site. They are born on the drawing board. The construction phase simply realises what the design phase has produced.
Second — the cost of correction is not equal across phases
The cost of risk management carried out during the design phase is not comparable to the cost of correction arising during construction. A design modification at the planning stage takes hours. The same modification during construction — involving regulatory consultation, work stoppages, and potential structural demolition — represents a cost that is orders of magnitude greater. This is one of the best-documented relationships in construction project management.
Third — risk does not disappear; it relocates
If the design phase does not include risk analysis, interference review and HSE-focused design coordination, the risks are not eliminated — they are displaced. Into the construction phase, into the operational phase, or into an incident that actually occurs.
What This Means for Each of the Three Stakeholder Groups
Investors and decision-makers
Omitting design-phase HSE coordination creates a real, if unquantified, financial exposure: the risk of design revisions, delay penalties arising from construction overruns, and — in the event of an incident — legal and reputational risk. These are recurring project risks that are well-documented in industry statistics.
Technical managers and project managers
Health and safety problems that arise during construction — and land on their desks — can almost without exception be traced back to a decision made during the design phase. The tool for prevention rather than firefighting is the early involvement of a design-phase coordinator.
Designers and design firms
The HSE coordinator is not an external auditor reviewing finished drawings. They are a participant in the design process, continuously feeding back the health and safety consequences of technical decisions. This reduces designer liability — it does not increase it.
The True Cost of Uncalculated Risk Assumption
Failing to involve an HSE coordinator during project preparation does not cost zero — it simply means the invoice does not arrive at this stage. The question is when and in what form it will arrive.
Industry practice consistently shows that this invoice materialises during the construction phase, in regulatory proceedings, in design revision cycles, or — in the most serious cases — in an incident that has already occurred. The common feature of all three scenarios: addressing them costs a fraction of what design-phase coordination would have required.
| Criterion | ✅ Coordinator involved from design phase | ❌ Coordinator not involved |
|---|---|---|
| ⏱️ Risk identification | At the design table — manageable | On site — forced solution |
| 💰 Cost of correction | Low — design fee level | Orders of magnitude higher |
| 📈 Project predictability | High — known risk profile | Low — hidden risks |
| 🏛️ Regulatory risk | Addressed in advance | Materialises during proceedings |
| ⚖️ Legal liability | Documented and shared | Concentrated — difficult to defend |
| ⚙️ Operational safety | Documented, lifecycle-level | Built-in, undocumented risk |
| 🧠 Nature of decision | Informed risk management | Uncalculated risk assumption |
Solar Safety HSE Ltd.
Conclusion
Design-phase HSE coordination is not a formal compliance exercise. It is an active management tool for a project's risk profile — and its effectiveness is greatest precisely where intervention is cheapest: at the design table.
"Those who skip this step do not save money — they make a decision about when and under what circumstances they will deal with risk. That decision can be an informed one. But only if the decision-maker is fully aware of what they are taking on."
Solar Safety HSE Kft.
Our construction HSE coordination service supports investors and project teams from the design phase onwards, using a documented methodology — with the aim that when construction begins, there are no risks to manage reactively, but a solid foundation to build on.
📩 If you are looking for professional HSE coordination support for an upcoming project, please get in touch:
📞 +36 20 539-1769 | +36 20 398-2055